What evidence should be collected next to identify the selected unit for a family of future decisions?
这篇论文独立可证伪的问题是什么;它与共享 ontology 中其他九篇不重叠的部分。
What evidence should be collected next to identify the selected unit for a family of future decisions?
反对:This is Bayesian experimental design or active feature acquisition with `unit` renamed.
Kill signal:kill the independent paper if unit-directed acquisition never changes the selected evidence or downstream decisions under matched budgets.
论文如何回答这个问题:形式化对象、论证 spine 与所需证据。
The Unit Selection Variable $U\sim\Pi$ performs individual selection under the task-declared Population law $\Pi$. Current admissible information $\mathcal O$ conditions the world law $P(U\in du\mid\mathcal O)$; it does not select an individual. A learner maintains the separately parameterized belief $Q_\phi(du\mid\mathcal O)$ and need not match that conditional without an explicit calibration or consistency result. A proposed acquisition is not yet evidence: only its observed result may enlarge $\mathcal O$ to $\mathcal O^+$. Downstream response uses a kernel $K(dy\mid q,u,\mathcal O)$ that may remain stochastic after $u$ is fixed; it may omit $\mathcal O$ only under a declared response-sufficiency assumption. Any $Z_u$ is an optional derived property, not a replacement for the identity-bearing $u$. The update $\mathcal O\to\mathcal O^+$ concerns the same fixed individual only under a declared measurement/linkage protocol; reselection requires a joint selector law. If collecting evidence changes the selected individual, treatment, or response process, that change must be modeled as an intervention rather than silently treated as conditioning. Acquisition value is defined through future-query response or utility pushforwards, not raw entropy over identity labels. USL08 owns diagnostic evidence-channel design; an evolving controlled state/reward trajectory belongs to USL06 when it becomes the primary object.
We choose diagnostic evidence by its expected value for identifying the selected actual unit and improving a family of future decisions. This differs from querying a new sample label or reducing uncertainty for only one immediate task.
状态只记录可验证 delta:claim、SOTA opponent、theorem、experiment、manuscript 或 owner decision。
AAAI-27 abstract registered; full paper drafting.
define the evidence action and its observed result, the induced update from $P(U\in du\mid\mathcal O)$ to $P(U\in du\mid\mathcal O^+)$, the learner update of $Q_\phi$, and the future-query value functional; distinguish a passive diagnostic measurement from an intervention that changes the individual or response process, keep future targets/candidate queries outside evidence, and use `posterior` only under an explicitly Bayesian learner.
demonstrate a qualitative acquisition-order reversal.
create several candidate evidence channels with different unit/event informativeness and cost; compare entropy, label-risk and downstream unit-value acquisition rules.
Bayesian experimental design; active feature acquisition; pool-based active learning and information gain.
research-questions/USL08-active-unit-identification/seed.mdpapers/USL08-active-unit-identification/paper.md
后续每次可验证 delta 追加在此;canonical 状态以 seed.md / paper.md / submission-ledger 为准,本页由 build_paper_pages.py 重新生成。
阅读后直接在 Discord 写作工作区对应篇目下留言:点出 claim / 思路 / 进展中需要改的具体位置,DiscoSeed 与 CausaClaw 会把决定回填到 canonical 文件并重新生成本页。
进入 Discord 写作工作区 ↗ 返回十篇总览